Prediction of Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Ilias Zimmermann at M25 Lajeado 10-31-25
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 31 Oct at 02:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Eduardo Schiessl vs I. Zimmermann

BRA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

SUI
0
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Schiessl 0 - 0 Zimmermann
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schiessl | 0 |
| Zimmermann | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
J. E. Schiessl vs I. Zimmermann H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.37% (129-92) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (16-16) |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. E. Schiessl vs I. Zimmermann Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Joao Eduardo Schiessl and Ilias Zimmermann have slightly differing second serve success rates, with Zimmerman having a slight edge at 44.25% compared to Schiessl's 42.35%. Could Zimmermann's better second serve performance be a differentiator in their match-up?
- Return Game Strength: Schiessl surpasses Zimmermann in returning opponents' second serves, with a win rate of 42.17% over Zimmermann's 39.43%. However, Zimmermann excels at first serve returns with 32.90% compared to Schiessl's 28.02%.
- Break Point Resilience: Under pressure, Schiessl saves 51.74% of breakpoints, far surpassing Zimmermann's 42.19%. Would this higher breakpoint saving rate give Schiessl a competitive advantage?
- Match Success Rate: Over the past year, Zimmermann boasts a slightly better win rate at 66.67%, compared to Schiessl's 63.79%, though the number of matches played differs significantly between them.
- Preferred Surface: Both players perform best on clay with equal winning percentages. Zimmermann, however, struggles significantly indoors, as indicated by a career win rate of 0%.
- Tournament Levels: Schiessl has more extensive experience and success in lower-tier events, with a 68.18% success rate, yet the players differ in the caliber of opponents they have faced, with Zimmermann playing against higher-ranked opponents.
- Deciding Set Performance: In high-pressure deciding sets, Zimmermann has an impeccable record, winning 100% of such instances compared to Schiessl's 60%.
- Opponent Quality: Over the past year, Schiessl's opponents have been lower-ranked on average compared to those faced by Zimmermann, potentially skewing overall success rates.
Editorial Prediction (October 31, 2025, UTC):
Both players display strengths in various aspects of their recent performances. While Zimmermann shows a marginally better second serve and excels in deciding sets, Schiessl has superior return game statistics and better breakpoint resilience, suggesting an overall more balanced game.
Zimmermann's experience against stronger opponents might provide him with a unique edge in adapting to challenging situations, but his underperformance on indoor hard surfaces could be a significant drawback if this match is played under such conditions.
The slight gaps in statistical performance favor Schiessl, mainly due to his superior performance under pressure and consistent return game. Despite facing higher-ranked opponents, Zimmermann's limited match experience could tilt the scales toward Schiessl.
Overall, considering the intricate balance of strengths and weaknesses, Joao Eduardo Schiessl is likely to have the upper hand in this encounter, leveraging his resilience in pivotal moments to secure the win.
Joao Eduardo Schiessl vs Ilias Zimmermann Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
J. E. Schiessl Recent Matches Played
I. Zimmermann Recent Matches Played
Where To Watch Schiessl vs Zimmermann?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Schiessl Vs Zimmermann is now available here.

J. E. Schiessl vs I. Zimmermann Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.02% (108/75) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 58.49% (248/176) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.72% (30/28) |
| 53.29% (2132/1869) | Games Win/Loss | 50.37% (270/266) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 261 | Aces Total | 29 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 289 | Total Double Faults | 62 |
| 1:33:42 | Average Match Time | 1:11:38 |
| 397.48 | Average Opponent Rank | 235.15 |
| 65% (6939/10607) | 1st Serve % | 62% (766/1232) |
| 65% (4513/6939) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (474/766) |
| 50% (1817/3668) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (212/466) |
| 46% (521/1134) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (67/152) |
| 42% (4440/10603) | Return Points Win % | 44% (578/1315) |
| 59% (108/182) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 57% (24/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
| 46% (27/59) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 89% (103/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (15/13) |
| 11% (103/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (15/2) |
| 20% (80/16) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (12/1) |